🔗 Share this article

The debated, United States and Israel-funded Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) announces it is winding down its humanitarian work in the Palestinian territory, after almost six months.

The foundation had already suspended its several relief locations in Gaza subsequent to the ceasefire between Hamas and Israel was implemented in recent weeks.

The organization attempted to avoid UN systems as the chief distributor of relief to Palestinian residents.

International relief agencies would not collaborate with its system, claiming it was unethical and unsafe.

Numerous Gazans were fatally wounded while trying to acquire nourishment amid chaotic scenes near GHF's sites, mainly through Israeli military action, according to the UN.

Israel said its soldiers fired cautionary rounds.

Operation Conclusion

The organization declared on recently that it was winding down operations now because of the "effective conclusion of its humanitarian effort", with a cumulative three million shipments containing the equivalent of more than 187 million meals delivered to Palestinians.

The GHF's executive director, the foundation leader, further mentioned the United States-operated coordination body - which has been established to help execute the American administration's Gaza initiative - would be "adopting and expanding the system the foundation tested".

"The foundation's approach, in which Palestinian factions were unable to divert and benefit from humanitarian assistance, had major impact in bringing Palestinian factions to negotiations and achieving a ceasefire."

Comments and Positions

Hamas - which denies stealing aid - approved the termination of the humanitarian foundation, according to reports.

A representative of stated GHF should be made responsible for the harm it caused to Palestinians.

"We urge all global human rights groups to guarantee that responsibility is assigned after resulting in fatalities and harm of many residents and covering up the food deprivation strategy implemented by the Israeli government."

Foundation History

The foundation started work in Gaza on late May, a week after Israeli authorities had somewhat relaxed a comprehensive closure on aid and commercial deliveries to Gaza that persisted for nearly three months and resulted in critical deficits of vital resources.

After 90 days, a food crisis was announced in the Gaza metropolitan area.

The GHF's food distribution sites in southern and central Gaza were administered by United States-based protection companies and situated within Israeli military zones.

Relief Agency Issues

International organizations and their affiliates claimed the approach breached the core assistance standards of objectivity, fairness and autonomy, and that channelling desperate people into armed forces regions was inherently unsafe.

The UN's human rights office said it recorded the fatalities of no fewer than 859 Gazans attempting to obtain nourishment in the proximity to foundation locations between spring and summer months.

Another 514 people were fatally wounded around the routes of UN and other aid convoys, it added.

Most of them were killed by the Israel's armed forces, as per the organization's documentation.

Divergent Narratives

Israel's armed services claimed its forces had fired warning shots at people who approached them in a "menacing" manner.

The foundation stated there were no shootings at the relief locations and claimed the international organization of using "false and misleading" data from Gaza's Hamas-run health ministry.

Future Implications

The foundation's prospects had been unclear since Palestinian factions and Israeli authorities consented a halt in hostilities arrangement to carry out the first phase of Trump's peace plan.

The arrangement specified aid distribution would take place "free from intervention from the both sides through the United Nations and its agencies, and the Red Crescent, in conjunction with other worldwide bodies not connected in any way" with militant groups and the Israeli government.

UN spokesperson the international body's communicator stated recently that the organization's termination would have "no influence" on its operations "because we never worked with them".

He also said that while increased relief was entering the region since the truce was implemented on early October, it was "not enough to meet all the needs" of the 2.1 million residents.